Academic Work

Research

I study the structural shift from active to passive investing and its consequences for stock demand elasticity, expected returns, and the price of new shares. Separate lines of work ask who deserves credit when fund carbon scores fall, and how much of what retail attention predicts option prices already reflect.

Working Papers
Working Paper2026

Indexing and the Elasticity of Stock Demand

with Carter Davis

Previously circulated as From Active to Passive: The Consequences for Demand Elasticity

IFMB 2025 Best Paper AwardFour Corners/FMRC 2025 Invited Paper (one of five)

Passive investing makes stock demand less responsive to price. How much depends on who else holds the shares. Measuring indexing from portfolio holdings, including benchmark overlap inside active funds, we find that the most indexed stocks have demand about half as elastic as the least indexed. Index fund families' larger ownership explains only a quarter of this gap. Most comes from other owners whose low price sensitivity extends across their portfolios. At the Russell cutoff, added index ownership lowers elasticity while other owners' price sensitivity changes little. Index demand raises prices far more than it raises fundamental value.

JEL:G11, G12, G14, G23Keywords:passive investing, demand elasticity, index inclusion, Active Share, closet indexing, demand system, asset pricing

Presented at:NFA 2026 · MFA 2026 · Four Corners/FMRC 2025 · IFMB 2025 · HEC Montréal 2025 · FMA 2024

Working Paper2026

The Price of Passive Ownership

Previously circulated as The Passive Paradox

FMA 2025 Best Paper Award (Asset Pricing) — Semi-Finalist

During the rise of passive investing, heavily indexed stocks outperformed lightly indexed stocks, yet are priced to earn less. As indexed capital moved in, prices rose faster than earnings forecasts, rewarding existing shareholders and lowering expected returns for subsequent buyers. The gains remained five years later. Passive investing repeatedly grew faster than forecast, and heavily indexed stocks earned more when it did. Four empirical designs put the price of a percentage point of indexed ownership at about 1.4 percent of stock value. Lower expected returns are the price of passive ownership.

JEL:G11, G12, G23Keywords:asset pricing, institutional investors, index effect, passive investing, mutual funds, ETFs

Presented at:FMA 2025 · ESG UQAM 2025 · FMA 2023 Doctoral Student Consortium

Working Paper2026

Who Gets Credit When Carbon Scores Fall?

with Evan Jo

A fund can look greener without its manager shifting the portfolio toward greener firms. Since 2019, U.S. fund carbon intensity has fallen by about a third, yet managers' trading explains less than a tenth. Carbon intensity divides emissions by sales; rising sales drove most of the decline and output prices half. Forty-four percent of funds credited with a decline did not trade it down. Those prices carry most of a leading estimate of brown firms' response to cheaper capital, and sales, not carbon, carry the carbon premium. Carbon scores measure portfolio exposure; attribution reveals who deserves credit for changing it.

JEL:G11, G14, G23, Q54Keywords:delegated portfolio management, performance attribution, ESG ratings, carbon footprints, sustainability ratings, institutional investors

Presented at:GRASFI-Asia 2027 (scheduled)

Working Paper2026

Half the Signal: Retail Attention and the Price of Volatility

Retail investors reveal in public which stocks they are crowding into, and those stocks become more volatile the following week. Using 86.7 million Reddit comments, I show that the full implied volatility surface absorbs only about half of this public signal. Option prices do react, but not for long. Short-maturity implied volatility is higher when attention is high and falls over the next week while stock volatility remains elevated. Delta-hedged option buyers earn lower subsequent gains. The unabsorbed half improves volatility forecasts out of sample. Controlling for implied volatility does not control for what retail attention predicts.

JEL:G12, G13, G14, G40Keywords:retail investor attention, Reddit, social media, implied volatility surface, volatility forecasting, market efficiency

Presented at:International Behavioural Finance Conference 2026, Chicago Booth

Working Paper2026

Predictable Demand and the Price of New Shares

Previously circulated as Passive Investing and the Supply of New Shares

Index funds must buy part of every new issue by firms they already hold, in amounts and on dates index rules set before the deal is priced. These purchases grew from about 2 percent of dollars raised in seasoned offerings in 2002 to nearly 16 percent in 2023. Firms selling into more of this scheduled demand sell at higher prices once the deal is public, and the issue-size discount nearly disappears among the most passively owned issuers, far beyond what removing the purchased shares from the market would give. Sales of existing shares show no such pattern. At Russell share updates turnover rises on the close, and in lower-priced issuers the price rises into it. A growing share of new equity sells into demand known in advance.

Keywords:index recognition, seasoned equity offerings, passive investing, liquidity provision
Work in Progress

Who Writes the Puts? Retail Volatility Supply and Option Prices

How Do Active Funds React to the Rise of Passive Management?

with Laurent Barras, David Schumacher
Professional Publications

Research reports produced during professional engagements.

Professional Publication2024CEM Benchmarking Inc. Research Report

Asset Allocation and Fund Performance of Defined Benefit Pension Funds in the United States, 1998–2022

with C. Flynn, M. Van Bragt

Professional Publication2024CEM Benchmarking Inc. Research Insights

An Empirical Analysis of the Drivers of Record Keeping Cost in U.S. Defined Contribution Plans

with J. Weeda, J. Stamper, K. Vandolder